|
|
XviD from 500 to 4000 kbps
Side By Side Help
- Click on any of the 8 thumbnails above to analyze the specific still
- move your mouse over the image on the left to analyse specific details
- Click on
 and  to analyze parts of the still in more details.
- The
 show points of interest in the picture
- Ranking scores:
- 5. Hard/Unable to find any difference at 2X, ie: Perfect.
- 4. Differences are visible at 1X, but not too visible when watching the movie.
- 3. Defects visible when watching the movie, not too annoying.
- 2. Defects are annoying when watching.
- 1. Defects are overwhelming: Disturbs the viewing.
Superposition Help
- Click on any of the 8 thumbnails above to analyze the specific still
- Below appear 8 radio buttons labelled 'divx', 'original', etc...: Select the one you want to compare an image against (Original is selected by default)
- Click on any other label to see the specific image over the one you selected above. Release the mouse to hide it
- The show points of interest in the picture
- Ranking scores:
- 5. Hard/Unable to find any difference at 2X, ie: Perfect.
- 4. Differences are visible at 1X, but not too visible when watching the movie.
- 3. Defects visible when watching the movie, not too annoying.
- 2. Defects are annoying when watching.
- 1. Defects are overwhelming: Disturbs the viewing.
![]() |
|
500: 1
750: 1
1000: 2
1500: 2
2000: 3
3000: 4
4000: 4
| There are two things in this picture:
- On the top part, the waves are destroyed at 500kbps. They gradually appear up to 4K. Even at 3K (on the left) some details are gone.
- On the bottom, the shade to dark blue is just unwatchable below 1500kbps: All details are gone and macroblocks are the only thing left. You see them moving instead of the shade. At 1500kbps it is not too visible on a CRT TV. Up to 4000kbps it is visible on a computer screen although very dim at 4k
|
500: 3
750: 3
1000: 3
1500: 4
2000: 4
3000: 4
4000: 4
| Everyone is fairly good here.
- Details are gone from the waves from 500 to 1000. From 1500 to 4000, the image is surprisingly steady!
- Artifacts and blocks on Nemo show the same: An increase up to 1500kbps and stable above.
|
500: 3
750: 3
1000: 4
1500: 4
2000: 5
3000: 5
4000: 5
| Same scenario here than on the precedent frame: We can clearly see a steady improve from 500 to 1500, and then bitrate increase doesn't really improve quality.
|
500: 2
750: 3
1000: 4
1500: 4
2000: 5
3000: 5
4000: 5
| Again, the same can be observed. Any bitrate over 1500kbps seems a waste...
At 500kbps, the heads of the bords are really crushed.
|
500: 3
750: 3
1000: 4
1500: 5
2000: 5
3000: 5
4000: 5
| Same again and again. The images are very very close above 1500kbps. Below the quality increases steadily.
|
500: 2
750: 3
1000: 4
1500: 5
2000: 5
3000: 4
4000: 4
| At last! Something interesting ;) Here again, quality increases steadily until 1500kbps. And then, from where I'm seating, I can see a clear decrease in quality above 200kbps !!!! Look at the left fin!! This result is deeply disturbing!
|
500: 5
750: 5
1000: 5
1500: 5
2000: 5
3000: 5
4000: 5
| Everyone is perfect here.
|
|
![]()
| |
|
Superposition